Monsoon Sale is liveGet up to 75% OFFGrab the offer

Split Verdict on Section 17A

Supreme Court delivered split verdict on constitutional validity of Section 17A of PCA, 1988.

Check your eligibility now
Split Verdict on Section 17A

Why is it in the news?

→ Supreme Court delivered split verdict on constitutional validity of Section 17A of PCA, 1988.

→ Debate on protecting honest officers versus enabling corruption probes.

Category

Polity

Important Points

  • Section 17A introduced via PCA Amendment 2018; requires prior approval before investigating official acts. Justice K.V. Viswanathan upheld Section 17A conditionally, requiring independent authority opinion (Lokpal/Lokayuktas).
  • Justice B.V. Nagarathna struck it down as unconstitutional, citing Article 14 and redundancy due to Section 19.
  • PCA, 1988 enacted on Santhanam Committee recommendations (1962–64).
  • Section 19 mandates prior sanction at prosecution stage.
  • Vineet Narain (1998) struck down “Single Directive”.
  • Dr Subramanian Swamy (2014) struck down Section 6A of DSPE Act.
  • Emphasised need for swift trials and penalties for false complaints.


Share this article